<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Eddie Awad’s Blog - Latest Comments in Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.disqus.com/</link><description>News, views, tips and tricks on Oracle and other fun stuff</description><atom:link href="https://awads.disqus.com/oracle_technology_network_stats_and_a_tweet/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:39:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; it’s not 255 unless we count other planets and galaxies&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Um, but discounting Peteria and Galgamax, it's still suspicous that it says 255!  That's awful close to a power of two (2**8) . . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Burleson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, that should be 255 countries "and territories".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Kestelyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:49:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good catch Don. Based on &lt;a href="http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm"&gt;this website&lt;/a&gt;, the number is 194. In any case, it's not 255 unless we count other planets and galaxies :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eddie Awad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Eddie,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Countries containing OTN members: 255&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Er, aren't there only 196 countries?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?&amp;amp;q=196+countries" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/search?&amp;amp;q=196+countries"&gt;http://www.google.com/searc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder where the other 59 are?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Burleson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LinkedIn doesn't have the Oracle employee directory. It also does not have the trust level of being inside the Oracle firewall. We're not reinventing the wheel. We repurposing it.&lt;br&gt;Jake&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pete,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe Connect has features specific to Oracle and not available in other social networks like linked-in and Facebook. I do not know. But, I agree with you, why reinvent the wheel if they are the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eddie Awad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle Technology Network Stats and a Tweet</title><link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/10/10/oracle-technology-network-stats-and-a-tweet/#comment-3659363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Eddie,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the diagram and description in the link are not brilliant but from the diagram connect looks suspiciously like linked-in. why re-invent the wheel why not use a hugely successful solcial network that already exists to connect people interested in Oracle, there are of course many others as well already out there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cheers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pete&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Finnigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>