Re: Keep first, Keep last

eddieawad — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:25:21 -0000

Anthony, you're right. That's an important distinction. So, to test, I added the following two rows to t:

<pre>
insert into t (n) values (400)
/
insert into t (n) values (400)
/
</pre>

Then, I ran the first query:

<pre>
HR@XE> select n
2 from
3 (select n,
4 dense_rank() over(
5 order by cnt desc) as
6 rnk
7 from
8 (select n,
9 count(*) as
10 cnt
11 from t
12 group by n)
13 x)
14 y
15 where rnk = 1
16 /
</pre>

I got:

When I ran the second query:

<pre>
HR@XE> select max(n) keep(dense_rank first
2 order by cnt desc) n
3 from
4 (select n,
5 count(*) cnt
6 from t
7 group by n)
8 /
</pre>

I got:

Which proves that KEEP...FIRST will only keep one value: the greatest number.

Of course, you could change to first query to select the maximum:

<pre>
select max(n) from ( ...first query ...)
</pre>

which effectively makes it return the same result as the one with KEEP in this example.

However, testing stats_mode:

<pre>
HR@XE> select stats_mode(n) from t;
</pre>

Returned:

<pre>
STATS_MODE(N)
-------------
300
</pre>

stats_mode does not work in 9i or below.

Thanks for this clarification.

Re: Keep first, Keep last

Anthony Wilson — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:51:44 -0000

The two example queries will not return the same results in general.

If there are 2 values of n in the table with equal maximum frequencies (i.e. two modes), then the first query will return both top ranked values. The second query will return the maximum of the two top-ranked values.

Also, see:

select stats_mode(n) from t;

... which will return strictly one of the modes, although we can't predict which one.

Eddie Awad’s Blog - Latest Comments in Keep first, Keep last

Re: Keep first, Keep last

Re: Keep first, Keep last